"We should continue to develop a vision in which we use digitalization to bring about social progress," says Daniel Buhr, researcher and academic. "This could perhaps be the vision of Welfare 4.0."
Daniel Buhr is head of the Steinbeis Transfercenter Social and Technological Innovation and teaches policy analysis and political economy at the Eberhard Karls University in Tübingen. He is co-author of Industry 4.0 and European Innovation Policy (link), one of the latest Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung papers on the potential of economic and innovation policy in the European Union. In talking with FES Connect Managing Editor Mila Shopova, Buhr expands on the potential of digitalization to bring about social progress and inclusive growth and the policy steps needed to move towards a modernized welfare State.
Digitalization offers great potential for economic development as well as social progress: technically, through the merging of goods and services into smart objects that will allow products to be manufactured more quickly, using fewer resources and, hence, more efficiently. Organizationally, by organizing companies and governments in new ways and creating new forms of employment and business models that will offer us a whole range of services quicker, better and cheaper. But, also, socially, through more empowerment, participation and inclusion—or better ways to combine work with taking care of a family or of the elderly and disabled. Think of better diagnosis, documentation and decisions in the health and care sector, supported by Big Data and artificial intelligence or telehealth and telecare services that already serve a lot of people, especially in rural areas, for example in Scotland, Denmark or Sweden today.
Digitalization can lead to social progress, but it is, of course, not a given. For that reason, the debate must also be intensified at the European level. Societies in the individual member States are already strongly interconnected through the single market alone and are thereby also affected by social standards, opportunities and limitations in other member States. Modernization of societies and welfare States, by investing in kindergartens, schools and universities, health and social care systems as well as digital technologies, then means promoting not only economic growth but also social progress.
Social standards are not downsides for economic growth but, rather, form the foundation of innovative societies in which both producers and users benefit from faster, more successful and more customized innovations. This also means that more investments are needed, especially in the digital infrastructure, to modernize the economy and the welfare State. However, this requires a functioning tax system and also a shift away from the strict financial and austerity policies so that States can become more active again and invest, for example, in innovation, research and education. If the European Union is to be a project of international solidarity and of common economic and social progress, innovative processes for social progress must not remain limited to a handful of regions or nation-States but have to be promoted systematically and across the EU. We better join forces here—that is a strong asset of the European Union, especially in comparison to many other regions in the world.
Absolutely. We do already notice an increasing concentration of data in the hands of a few monopolies able to evade state control, an intensification of the digital divide and the polarization of society. Therefore, societies need also financial contributions and taxes of companies and capital owners in order to invest in the modernization of the welfare State—in technical as well as social infrastructure.
Without regulation and democratic public intervention, we will see more concentration and even more polarization of skills and labour, wealth and health, I guess. We can see that already.
Digitalization requires an active State that not only provides a [digital] infrastructure, digital administration and comprehensive investments in research and education but also ensures social and technical standards, general data protection and data security—and also knows how to use public procurement actively. For all these tasks, a welfare State is required that is able to proactively manage its responsibilities: one that makes use of the opportunities of digitalization for its modernization and tries to better align and orchestrate its economic and innovation policies with health, care and labour market policies.
Concentration of data and knowledge, power and opinion in the hands of a few digital platforms— like Amazon, Google, Facebook— that are able to avoid taxation and other state regulations. Or governments using digitalization for repression and coercion, as for example the case with social scoring in China.
We should continue to develop a vision in which we use digitalization to bring about social progress: by enhancing our welfare State in such a way that, on one hand, it absorbs the risks of growing flexibilization and, on the other hand, it offers us new ways of harnessing the opportunities of working and living without space and time constraints—ways that ultimately bring about social progress. This could perhaps be the vision of Welfare 4.0.
For more information on the publication Industry 4.0 and European Innovation Policy, contact Philipp Fink, head of the Working Group on Sustainable Structural Policy and responsible for Climate, Environmental, Energy and Structural Policy in the Division of Economic and Social Policy at Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Berlin.
In a reshaped multilateral order, democracy on the national and global levels are mutually reinforcing and a reformed, well-resourced and more...
The global extractives industry is under increasing pressure to rein in its widespread violations of labour, environmental and human rights.
The opportunity remains for civil society organizations to ensure implementation is development-orientated, and facilitates sustainable development,...